Talk:Lee Jasper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Lee Jasper has been comprehensively cleared of all allegations This is not disputed and is independantly verified. http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/02/london-london —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.112.9 (talk) 19:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is nothing more than a hagiography of Jasper.There is clearly no neutral point of view at all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.7.128.138 (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What a joke this article is - it's completely biased and shows no objectivity whatsoever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.204.75.86 (talk) 21:41, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Emails[edit]

Even if the emails were obtained unethically, the article should state why they were so controversial. 86.145.69.220 (talk) 15:22, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It should indeed, and now it does. --62.163.152.44 (talk) 12:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

COI[edit]

It has been suggested that Jasper himself has written a large part of this article as part of a wider campaign of self-promotion. CertainlyUser:Teflontanks appears to have only edited this article, and seems rather pro-Jasper. Time for a major rewrite? 82.31.15.11 (talk) 18:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That user hasn't even edited this wikipedia in the last three years. Plenty of time and many others have edited it since then. Please feel free to, and you are encouraged to , WP:BEBOLD and edit to improve the article. Youreallycan (talk) 19:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This has also been posted at the BLPNoticeboard here. Youreallycan (talk) 19:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been shown that Teflontank is in fact Lee Jasper himself — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.169.244.199 (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We are just not interested in such bloggy claims - that user has not edited here for three years and many other editors have worked on the article in that time. Youreallycan (talk) 21:58, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We are interested in the truth, so the link stays. If you'd bothered to read the investigation, you'd know that the Lee Jasper article here has barely changed since Teflontank (Lee Jasper) stopped editing it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.169.244.199 (talk • contribs)
Please read - WP:Talk page guidelines - and stop posting this blog external here. We are interested in Verifiability not truth here. If you continue to post it I will request the page be semi protected so you are unable to post on it. Youreallycan (talk) 00:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Leave the link there so that people can read it and make up their own minds. The username is verified as being that of Jasper, even down to the same spelling mistakes and poor grammar. Rather than offer a refutation, you simply deleted something with which you disagree. Not the behaviour of an honourable person, certainly. Now, stop your vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.169.244.199 (talk • contribs)
Read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines - especially the part that says, External links to locations that are not considered WP:RS's should not be posted on article talkpages and can be removed by other users. Stop posting that blog here and please take your personal dispute elsewhere. Youreallycan (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Like I said, let the people decide whether it is a reliable source and stop the petty censorship.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.169.244.199 (talk • contribs)
You need to understand - that blog is not going to benefit this article in any way. If you want to improve the article - go ahead and WP:BE BOLD and edit it. We are only interested in improvements to the article, not in three year old titillation and partisan trivia - go back to you blog with that. These are en wikipedia reliable sources - WP:RS - and that blog is not one of them. Youreallycan (talk) 23:14, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It would benefit the article (so would a lot more editing) but needs reliable sources to back it up. Until then it should not be included Rsloch (talk) 14:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed some recent edits by Teflontanks. This is actually Jasper's own account. He knows that we know that he is Teflontanks, so why is he openly editing his own page? And where has all the material gone in which he was accused of funnelling money to a love interest of his and that the police investigation only stalled because documentary evidence had been destroyed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.169.244.199 (talk) 13:18, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Lee Jasper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lee Jasper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:28, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lee_Jasper&oldid=1195379073"