Talk:LGBT and Wikipedia/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Another source re: Chelsea Manning

https://slate.com/technology/2013/08/chelsea-manning-wikipedia-perfectly-reflects-new-gender-of-whistleblower-formerly-known-as-bradley.html

---Another Believer _(Talk) 23:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Added this to the "Names and pronouns" section this morning.Historyday01 (talk) 14:09, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. I've made the Names and pronouns section a subsection of LGBT content. I hope this works for you. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

The page is looking really good now! If I have some time this weekend, I'll try to do some more edits. Historyday01 (talk) 15:36, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Great, thanks! I am going to go ahead and archive this section since the source has been folded into the entry. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:44, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Capitol Hill edits

Anything here worth mentioning? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

I don't see why not. This article is somewhat related (in the sense that it focuses on users on Capital Hill editing Wikipedia) and might be worth mentioning, as is this. Historyday01 (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@Historyday01

Done The two additional sources you've shared aren't LGBT-related (unless I'm overlooking something), but I've added a bit to the entry based on the Business Insider source. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:28, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Queering Wikipedia chapter

Resolved

Recommend a look at WP:ELDUP, and the article should integrate ref #1 with external link #1 by bringing in the URL to the reference. Usually we don't want an external link which is essentially a copy of a citation. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

Its been moved into the main text. I think the external link was there first, then ref #1 was added later... that's why there was duplication. Historyday01 (talk) 04:45, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

@Bri I believe we can consider this resolved? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Yes, definitely resolved. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

I should have noted it was resolved earlier. Oops. Historyday01 (talk) 18:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)