Talk:Kisschasy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV Issues[edit]

Whoever wrote this article is joking themselves. It's not a biography, as much as a piece of nonsense with no use to anyone. Bassbill 06:42, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how is is nonsense. It is quite factual and I find it useful myself. Pretty much everything here is verifiable. If you know more, why don't you or why haven't you changed it yourself? Kit_Fallapart 21:15, 06 November 2006
This article sounds like it belongs in a music magazine not wikipedia. --210.49.245.236 14:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)A[reply]
This article is just advertisement and does not belong in Wikipedia 72.181.3.84 01:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this article could do with some revision - not so much in its content but its presentation and prose. Trioj85 04:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).--Dan027 06:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone through the article and re-edited it to remove any POV and unencyclopedic phrasing and believe it is almost fine now. As far as I can see, it just needs independent sources for the ARIA nomination and going gold in Australia. I also introduced internal links in as many places as seemed appropriate.The Kinslayer 10:57, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, now the award nominations and gold status have been sourced and I can see no other issues with this article now. The Kinslayer 21:50, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated infomation[edit]

I have removed or changed the tense of some infomation in the biograohy section and removed outdated infomation about the release date.It seems like someone just keeps adding more infomation under the old infomation without reading through it first. Staceluvschocolate 07:19, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ugly Birds in a Beautiful Cage[edit]

Where's the proof this is a single?! New singles are usually added to their myspace next to Black Dress and 1 older track. At the moment, they uploaded Tiny Plastic Cup, that would be the most likely choice as a single as they have uploaded it onto there already. Also, Ugly Birds is slow and turgid and one of the worst tracks on the album. Opinions, Do Do's, This Bed, and most of their previous singles minus The Shake have all been radio-friendly and upbeat, which is why the most recent ones have been so successful (Opinions has reached the top 10 and remained in the top 20 for 3 months due to its radio-friendly pop punch). When they release a single, it will most likely be something more upbeat and radio-friendly like Perfect Way To Meet or Tiny Plastic Cup, in the same vein as Face Without A Name was for their first album. SilverNightFire 11:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Ugly Birds in a Beautiful Cage was one of the first songs they wrote for the new album so it is probably the closest to them. they played it when they were on tour with untited paper people. so they wrote it ages ago. i do love the song, but i agree that it is not quite radio freindly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.57.243 (talk) 11:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is no way it will be the 3rd single. Strings and Drums was on Rage last night. 124.171.88.75 (talk) 12:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Band members redirect[edit]

Why do all of the band members' names redirect to the Kisschasy page? Wouldn't it make more sense to have them be redlinks? I'd change it myself, but I don't know how. VaughnJess 09:34, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KissChasy cover DPro 03-1-.jpg[edit]

Image:KissChasy cover DPro 03-1-.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kisschasy - Kisschasy The Movie.jpg[edit]

Image:Kisschasy - Kisschasy The Movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


stupid environmentalists[edit]

I was watching Rage thismorning and it had something about a charity concert for environmetal awareness before the video clip, the video clip in which they are seen rideing in a stretch hummer, I think I have made my point. Fists (talk) 10:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not really sure you understood the clip. I think they are making fun of the make poverty history concert amongst other concerts. All these celebrity’s decided it would be great to join the concert to show their support, yet flew in private jets to attend the shows, thus making the concerts a complete waste of time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.45.117.223 (talk) 02:40, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was a Joke, dumbass. --121.223.141.212 (talk) 05:17, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a satire of traditional "rock stars". 123.100.61.101 (talk) 11:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]



2009 Channel [V] Oz Artist of the year[edit]

It was won by Kisschasy ([[1]], any chance we can edit this article into Kisschasy's page? - --121.218.88.46 (talk) 06:07, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 12:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kisschasy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:39, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kisschasy&oldid=1205687153"