Talk:Jules-Émile Verschaffelt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jules-Émile Verschaffelt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability resource[edit]

The notion of a critical exponent was first used by Van der Waals in 1893 for describing the critical behavior of the surface tension. He also noticed in the early 1890's that experimental data on capillarity indicated a nonclassical value for the surface tension exponent. Verschaffelt found that this was due to the fact that the coexistence curve exponent beta was nonclassical. In 1900, he established precise nonclassical values for the exponents beta and delta. Even though from this time onwards the "cubic law" for fluid coexistence curves was accepted, the true implication of Verschaffelt's results, namely the failure of classical theory, was not appreciated. Some reasonsfor this lack of impact will be given.

If I weren't on the outside of the paywall, I might have checked out the reasons then added a sentence to this biography, which is extremely light on V's specific accomplishments. — MaxEnt 01:37, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]