This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. After relisting and no !votes for the past six days, it's not gonna happen. Favonian (talk) 17:41, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
– There are six men listed upon the James Read (disambiguation) page, with little indication that the septuagenarian supporting actor's renown has attained such heights as to overwhelm the combined notability of the remaining five men. — Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 12:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC) — Relisting.BilledMammal (talk) 16:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pageviews are massively in favor of the actor, and not many people are leaving his page to either of the other men in the hatnote. I've added a link to the DAB in the hatnote of James Read (it wasn't there before), but I think this is enough to indicate a primary topic. Oppose. Skarmory(talk •contribs) 05:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Another example of why "dab page has however many people on it" is useless PT criteria. James Read Chadwick is a PTM, and the two Jim Reads are not known as James. The other two don't seem known as James Read either, although they have a better argument. But even if all six men were known as "James Read", it isn't relevant because the actor is still clearly PT, as Skarmory showed. Nohomersryan (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
