Talk:In re Gault

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

After the decision what was the affect off the decision upon the person (Gault) and persons involved? Did they release him? How long was he in reform school? Did he sue for false imprisonment and/or violation of Civil Rights / Constitutional Rights? ETC . . . --Bmoshier (talk) 16:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cap or lowercase on "re"?[edit]

Shouldn't this article be title "In re Gault", parallel with similar articles such as In re Debs and In re Guardianship of Kowalski? 68.99.138.152 04:31, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That was me. Cactus Wren 04:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it now the lower-case "r". Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 03:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

accuracy of quote[edit]

Someone left a note in article:

In an 8-1 decision the Supreme Court ruled that Gault’s commitment to the State Industrial School "was a clear violation of his 14th Amendment due process rights, since he had been denied the right to legal counsel, had not been formally notified of the charges against him, had not been informed of his right against self-incrimination (remain silent), had no opportunity to confront his accusers and had been given no right to appeal his sentence to a higher court."(this quote is incorrect, it does not appear in the opinion)

Since I'm not familiar with the truth or falsehood of the statement, but it is inappropriate in the article, I moved it here.--Prosfilaes (talk) 22:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]