Talk:Human rights complaints against Maclean's magazine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I've spun this article off from material in the Ontario Human Rights Commission article. Reggie Perrin (talk) 19:33, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a good move. This issue deserves its own page. (Hyperionsteel (talk) 00:51, 11 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Question: Why are Andrew Coyne's extensive real-time blogs not included? Rwerner —Preceding comment was added at 09:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

This article needs better sources than op-ed pieces from the National Post. News reports would not be a problem, bu the Post seems to have a particular bias. Even that's alright (as all sources have bias), be we are relying far too heavily on it.

Bless sins (talk) 21:47, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Post only seems to have bias relatively to some of the other media. Careful examination, however, shows that it is indeed just that relative difference that accounts for the perception of bias, and the articles in question are quite sensible. ThVa (talk) 03:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article contains perhaps a dozen quotations from the plaintiffs, expressing the totality of their argument in clear terms. It contains only a small handful of quotations from the defendants, and those do not express their arguments accurately. Short version, this is a horribly, horribly biased article written by supporters of the plaintiffs. It needs to be rewritten from the ground up by a writer who does not have a dog in the hunt. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phil Weingart (talk • contribs) 16:51, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]


I just wanted to note that the following are now dead links. It is important to get an updated source for these quotations--can anyone help/fix? 

"Canadian Human Rights Commission dismisses camplaint against Macleans" Archived 2012-07-17 at the Wayback Machine, Canadian Press, June 28, 2008

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Human rights complaints against Maclean's magazine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Human_rights_complaints_against_Maclean%27s_magazine&oldid=1201240956"