Talk:Germanium tetrachloride

Chemicals: Core Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This is a core article in the WikiProject Chemicals worklist.

Untitled[edit]

Tornqvist EGM, Libby WF (1922). "Germanium III Germanium tetrabromide and Germanium tetrachloride". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 44: 299–307. DOI--Stone 08:35, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Name[edit]

According to naming conventions, this article should be called Germanium(IV) chloride. Move?? Wim van Dorst (Talk) 21:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Germanium tetrachloride/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Not much chemistry. Wim van Dorst (Talk) 21:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Last edited at 21:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 16:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Cleanup[edit]

Parts of this article were about the element Germanium and its oxide, not about Germanium tetrachloride. I moved the relevant information to the respective articles, including the references. Bert490 (talk) 03:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

English[edit]

@DMacks if you wish to keep the British English, you should change the current American English spelling to British spelling per the guideline of WP:ENGVAR for the sake of consistency. For example, it is hydrolyse in British English, not hydrolyze.589q (talk) 14:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for noticing that some later additions to the article were not in keeping with the original style. DMacks (talk) 14:43, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]