Talk:GNU coding standards

Line length[edit]

Do the GNU Coding Standards say anything about line length? – 89.8.40.93 (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed un-encyclopedic sentence[edit]

I removed the following, which feels subjective: it can be a good idea for most authors of free Unix programs to follow the standards — whether or not their programs are officially part of the GNU Project. Perhaps it can be reformulated on the form "XXYYZZ suggests that ...", if someone can find a good reference. --Erik 14:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not only subjective, but wrong — see the Linux Kernel Coding Style guide, the first two chapters of which make some cogent points against the GNU style. Should a criticism section be added to the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.145.232 (talk) 15:34, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale?[edit]

What's the rationale behind this formatting? What is it based on? Why have the mentioned decisions been made? Since it's radically different from common code formatting, there has to be a reason, right? I think article deserves a section for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.91.30.226 (talk) 07:48, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. What is the history of the style? Valcumine (talk) 02:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GNU Coding Standards → GNU coding standards –

Even the GNU uses lower case ([www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/]): "The GNU coding standards, last updated ..."

Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. $Tony (talk)$ 03:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support per the official web page GNU coding standards and generally no reason to capitalize. Dicklyon (talk) 05:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. --Pnm (talk) 04:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GNU coding standards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090304122402/http://www.ronancrowley.com/Eclipse_GNU_Style.xml to http://www.ronancrowley.com/Eclipse_GNU_Style.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]