Talk:Frank Soltis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I don't think Frank Soltis lead the original POWER design. He got involved with POWER/PowerPC when AS/400 switched to PowerPC. Guy Harris 22:36, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe he led the team, but I do think he was highly involved with it from the very early stages. What we currently call POWER was largely developed for the AS/400 and RS/6000, so it's pretty likely that Soltis had some heavy involvement in the designs... There's an article he wrote a while back about early PowerPC/POWER history that might be relevant here:

[1] -- uberpenguin 22:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What we currently call POWER is derived in part from AS/400 (POWER4 and POWER5 implement the "Amazon" PowerPC/POWER2 superset), but I have the impression that POWER and, possibly, POWER2 were designed for the UNIX RISC workstation/server market, i.e. as SPARC/MIPS competitors, and that the AS/400 people weren't involved at that stage. Soltis' "Inside the AS/400" book indicates that the original plan for RISC AS/400's was to extend IMPI to 64 bits and add some RISC-style instructions, and IBM management pushed them into going with PowerPC. The Amazon project started in 1991, which was the beginning of his involvement with PowerPC, so, while he wasn't involved from the beginning of POWER or even PowerPC, he was definitely involved not too long after they got started (i.e., as soon as the AS/400 group decided to look at PowerPC). Guy Harris 00:51, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
That all seems to jive with what little I know about POWER history. I'll defer to you since you obviously have done more research on this than I have. -- uberpenguin 01:17, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Frank Soltis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Frank Soltis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]