Talk:Fergie's Fledglings

Football: England / Manchester United Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Manchester United task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Jovan Kirovski[edit]

I added Jovan Kirovski to the 1990s squad and am trying to figure out why he was erased. Kirovski was a member of the reserve side that the other listed players were on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.189.43.9 (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's time to add the next batch of Fergie's fledglings. 2000s: Frederico Macheda, Rafael, Fabio Da Silva, Danny Welbeck, Darron Gibson, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.104.153.100 (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have those players ever been referred to in the media as a new "batch" of Fergie's Fledglings? – Pee Jay 18:47, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Delete?[edit]

Does this really require its own article? Would this be better merged into the Alex Ferguson years sub-article, or merged with 'Busby Babes' article and named something like 'Famous generations of Manchester United players'? The Busy Babes were iconic, and the term was very widely used and still is, the term 'Fergie's Fledglings' is less so, and very seldom used (I can't recall ever hearing the term, except in the odd newspaper article). Thoughts? Tomlock01 (talk) 19:46, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The term is dying out, I'll admit, partly because United aren't really producing their own youth talent any more. However, it was heavily used in the mid-1990s, and considering that team was the most successful in the club's history, I would say the article is worth keeping. Feel free to nominate at AfD though. – Pee Jay 01:01, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2000s Fledglings[edit]

There should be a new batch of 2000s....

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Manchester-United-s-Carling-Cup-team-is-the-future-of-the-club-says-Sir-Alex-Ferguson-article640203.html

The terms have been loosely used in a lot of newspaper and even Fergie's also said that couple of times. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.170.123 (talk) 03:43, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's time to put 2000s Fledglings!

http://www.sportinglife.com/football/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=soccer/11/08/08/SOCCER_Man_Utd_Youngsters.html&BID=165 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.108.147 (talk) 05:49, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Surely those would be the 2010s Fledglings? – Pee Jay 13:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fergie's Fledglings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]