Talk:Ethical living

This article was nominated for deletion on July 12, 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Article is massively POV, POV title, et cetera. What constitutes ethical living? Is it being nice to children or making juice out of puppies? I may have an opinion ... but this article with it's content and title is as hopelessly point of view as Why eating meat is wrong. WilyD 04:02, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Abigaicatherine. Peer reviewers: Amjad.hanifah, Fei Wade.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:53, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Articles for Everything Found Using Search Engines[edit]

"Frugal living" gives 3,590,000 results[1].

3,690 for "fanatic living"[2].

40,100 for "sexy living"[3].

My point is that creating an article for everything that shows up on Google is insane and denigrates Wikipedia, not to mention the furtherance of ignorance.--Patchouli 16:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Showing your ignorance patchouli[edit]

"Ethical living" isn't simply two arbitary words stuck together, or plucked from the air! ethical living is a lifestyle movement, which is rapidly building a strong following. And to somehow suggest it is a random choice of words from google; not only shows your ignorance, but denigrates the serious enviromental issues that now face the whole of humanity thanks to global warming! --213.122.25.219 02:33, 17 September 2006

So, no POV issue there then? Unfortunately, this article is totally lacking in sources (besides an assertion in The Guardian that is growing in popularity because more was spent on what one organisation describes as ethical goods).Emeraude (talk) 12:20, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plans for this Page[edit]

Hello All! I plan to largely complete this page as a term paper for an economics class! Any information or feedback would be great!Meg17poole (talk) 01:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]