Talk:Ekrima Sa'id Sabri

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

unnamed section[edit]

well article does not carry much about the grand mufti...it is a clear pro-israel propaganda...I am an arab...an egyptian....I don't know about the protocol of the elders of zion....and i don't care to know if this is a hoax or has some of truth in it...Israel is a loose cannon and very much "spoilt" by the west to "defend it self"....I have seen the book in Egypt "the protocol of the elders of zion"...the one they display its cover in the wikipedia topic about "the protocol of the elders of zion"....it is a very stupidly edited, poorly displayed, non-cited book, very brief (low number of pages)...more close to a poster than a book that's to speak about it...it never attracted me to read what is in there although I am a part of the struggle....and i personally don't think that the jews are bent on world dominion...however zionism was bent on creation of a jewish nation over a land they may have thought that its present inhabitants would not mind or if they do, they would not be of an account for world powers. 129.128.247.47 14:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BLP[edit]

The inclusion of random quotes sourced to MEMRI violate the requirement that WP:BLPs that material be cited to third-party secondary sources (see WP:NPF which says:

Wikipedia contains biographical material on people who, while notable enough for an entry, are not generally well known. In such cases, exercise restraint and include only material relevant to their notability, focusing on high quality secondary sources. Material published by the subject may be used, but with caution; see above. Material that may adversely affect a person's reputation should be treated with special care; in many jurisdictions, repeating a defamatory claim is actionable, and there is additional protection for subjects who are not public figures.

Additionally, the inclusion of the category for the Protocols is completely unsupported by the article and as such has been removed. nableezy - 16:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]