Talk:East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A news item involving East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 18 February 2023. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has previously been nominated to be moved.
Discussions:
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 3, 2024. |
The section "Second Ohio derailment" should be removed due to lack of relevence.[edit]
The section discussion the second Ohio derailment should be removed. There have been six other rail accidents but those are not mentioned. Grinhelm (talk) 15:55, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Since there seems to be renewed media interest in train crashes (for whatever reason), should we consider spinning off to another article, "2023 Rail Accidents in the United States"? Kcmastrpc (talk) 16:18, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- The Springfield train wreck is captured on the page List of rail accidents (2020–present). The page shows major rail accidents in 2023. Grinhelm (talk) 16:20, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Meh. It isn't very relevant, but RSs have mentioned the two accidents together so following that coverage is a reasonable default. VQuakr (talk) 16:44, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe create 2023 United States freight derailments or a similar article to cover all of these derailments? InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 6 April 2023[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. The principal result of the discussion was a consensus that the current title is more WP:RECOGNIZABLE than the proposed one. A weaker consensus also emerged that the proposed title is more WP:PRECISE than necessary. (non-admin closure) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
2023 Ohio train derailment → 2023 East Palestine train derailment – WP:PRECISE would justify that a more precise title would be better suited for the article, and the previous move discussion did not show substantial opposition to mentioning East Palestine. Data from Google Trends shows that East Palestine gained more searches (albeit marginally) than "Ohio train derailment", and Google searches for the incident provide more results for "East Palestine" train rather than "Ohio train derailment", by almost double the amount of queries. All in all, while the improvement is marginal from changing the title to include East Palestine, it conforms with our policies and general trends better. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 17:53, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- @InvadingInvader: the previous move discussion, [1] did show rough consensus against moving to "East Palestine" as too obscure. What has changed since then? Your Google trends search compared apples to oranges by only including "train derailment" in the Ohio string. Here is the corrected one, with the caveat that this is a pretty useless way of looking at things in general. VQuakr (talk) 18:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- When an event happens in a small town, people search for it at a much higher rate without including what actually happened. It is necessary in this case to omit "train derailment" from East Palestine, as people very well (in my data at least) did search for it. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 18:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- ETA - you made a similar error on the Google searches; when corrected, "2023 Ohio train derailment" is clearly more common. Probably best to withdraw this move nom since it's solely predicated on errors. VQuakr (talk) 18:11, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- "2023 Ohio train derailment" has 18,000 results. Also think about why people searched for East Palestine in the first place; it was because of the train derailment. People would search for Ohio not only because of the train derailment but also Ohio University, Ohio facts and figures, the memes about Ohio which have recently appeared on TikTok... InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 18:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yup, which is roughly 10x as many hits as "2023 east palestine train derailment". The string has "train derailment" in it; arguments about TikTok are nonsensical. VQuakr (talk) 18:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Claiming that arguments involving TikTok are nonsensical is inaccurate. Is it as important as everything else? No. However, should it be mentioned when it comes to what readers search and with attention to rational information disambiguating? Absolutely. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 19:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- No, such arguments are completely, indefensibly, ridiculous. Equal-footing search terms exclude tiktok from both sets of search results equally, and show a ~~5x-10x balance of results in favor of the status quo title. Given that it is demonstrably incorrect or fallacious in every aspect, the most generous description of this nomination that can be given is "incompetent." VQuakr (talk) 20:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- How is popular culture and the thoughts of the youth ridiculous? We should be encyclopedic, but not completely exclusive to academia. We aren't anyways; if we are, we would not have articles on My Little Pony and Mario Kart. Moreover, Ohio's status as a meme has been covered by the press, see Yahoo Sports, HITC, and Dextero as examples. We aren't Citizendium. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 21:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- No, such arguments are completely, indefensibly, ridiculous. Equal-footing search terms exclude tiktok from both sets of search results equally, and show a ~~5x-10x balance of results in favor of the status quo title. Given that it is demonstrably incorrect or fallacious in every aspect, the most generous description of this nomination that can be given is "incompetent." VQuakr (talk) 20:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Claiming that arguments involving TikTok are nonsensical is inaccurate. Is it as important as everything else? No. However, should it be mentioned when it comes to what readers search and with attention to rational information disambiguating? Absolutely. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 19:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with this. If I’m looking for the news on this, just searching for the town name would give me hits, but I’d have to further narrow it down if I were to use the state as a search term. BhamBoi (talk) 04:31, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yup, which is roughly 10x as many hits as "2023 east palestine train derailment". The string has "train derailment" in it; arguments about TikTok are nonsensical. VQuakr (talk) 18:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- "2023 Ohio train derailment" has 18,000 results. Also think about why people searched for East Palestine in the first place; it was because of the train derailment. People would search for Ohio not only because of the train derailment but also Ohio University, Ohio facts and figures, the memes about Ohio which have recently appeared on TikTok... InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 18:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose and snow close since the proposed move target unambiguously fails WP:COMMONNAME. The WP:PRECISION concern is unfounded as there has only been one notable 2023 Ohio train derailment to date. VQuakr (talk) 18:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Consider also that the US EPA names the disaster as the East Palestine train derailment. Don't forget that there are other trains which derailed in Ohio in 2023, such as one near Cincinnati and another Norfolk Southern train in Springfield. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk)
- And are any of those other derailments notable enough for Wikipedia? Trainsandotherthings (talk) 12:18, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Also note that national some news sources call it "East Palestine train derailment" BhamBoi (talk) 04:34, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose. Proposed name is unrecognisable to many. In fact the current redirect from East Palestine should be changed, as the phrase East Palestine is at least ambiguous, a town with a population of less than 5000 can't compete as primary topic against the other meanings of Eastern Palestine. Andrewa (talk) 02:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Supply Truck picture is blatant political speech, wildly unnecessary, and completely out of place[edit]
Seriously this is there for political reasons. It was slipped in with the subtlety of a baboon. Mferrari3 (talk) 04:23, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. Considering MOS:PERTINENCE this image is unnecessary and distracting There's already another photo in that section anyways. If a better image can be found, this one should be replaced. Otherwise, we wouldn't be losing much by removing it either. In the alternative, if a gallery were added to this article, I would be in favour of putting this in the gallery and removing it from the main text instead of deleting it altogether. Combustible Vulpex (talk) 11:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
Requested move 17 February 2024[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment. Consensus to move, and consensus on the alternate proposed title. – robertsky (talk) 15:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
2023 Ohio train derailment → East Palestine train derailment – WP:COMMONNAME and the year does not need to be included as it could not be confused with any other disaster if the name of town is included. MountainDew20 (talk) 23:29, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support the proposed title is clearly more recognizable based on media coverage, and therefore more useful to our readers. I would not usually support this sort of move but this event has gotten an exceptional level of coverage, with almost all of it using "East Palestine" much more prominently than "Ohio". Elli (talk | contribs) 23:48, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The media coverage has put more attention to East Palestine than Ohio train derailment. Furthermore, in a previous discussion that had a similar approach, it was mentioned there were other incidents like this in Ohio. For me at least, I think the change would help make the disaster title be more recognizable.
- 174.44.191.134 (talk) 04:11, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment. Palestine unqualified brings to mind other things these days. Hyperbolick (talk) 22:39, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Oppose: What is the evidence that the proposed name is the COMMONNAME? The EPA calls it the East Palestine, Ohio Train Derailment. The West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection calls it the East Palestine, OH Train Derailment. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection calls it East Palestine Train Derailment. The NTSB calls it the Norfolk Southern Railway Train Derailment. The New York Times calls it Ohio Train Derailment. The Guardian calls it the 2023 Ohio rail disaster. NBC calls it Ohio train derailment. Reuters calls it Ohio Train Derailment. APNews calls it East Palestine train derailment. It doesn't really seem to have a COMMONNAME either way. In that case, WP:NCWWW applies. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 01:03, 25 February 2024 (UTC)- Use Ohio if you want to, I just think the name should include “East Palestine”. MountainDew20 (talk) 19:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- WP:TITLE, a policy, takes precedence over the WP:NCEVENTS guideline (see my !vote below). As much as this was reported as an Ohio event, nearby Pennsylvania was also affected, and since East Palestine—as the epicenter—rightly appears in many news headlines, it makes sense to have it in the title. In any event, none of the examples given in Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events) § Road and rail come with the year. StonyBrook babble 23:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Changing my vote to East Palestine, Ohio train derailment per StonyBrook. Bait30 Talk 2 me pls? 23:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Opposeas proposed, but Support East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment per all five WP:CRITERIA and User:Hyperbolick. Agree that East Palestine is ambiguous enough to parse by US state, so I would insist on that detail. A look through Category:Railway accidents and incidents in the United States gets us the following short list of dual US city-state train article names that already exist:
- 1906 Washington, D.C., train wreck
- 1966 Everett, Massachusetts, train crash
- 1971 Salem, Illinois, derailment,
- 1995 Palo Verde, Arizona, derailment
- 1999 Bourbonnais, Illinois, train crash
- 2016 Chester, Pennsylvania, train derailment
- Gilchrest Road, New York, crossing accident
- Cayce, South Carolina, train collision
- Waverly, Tennessee, tank car explosion
- Weyauwega, Wisconsin, derailment
- Per WP:CONCISE and WP:CONSISTENT, almost half of these indeed lack the date identifier, so I don't see why it's really necessary. StonyBrook babble 23:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Inconsistent Number of Derailed Cars[edit]
In the first paragraph is states that 38 cars derailed, but under the derailment section, it says 51 cars derailed. Which is it actually? Or is it that 51 cars became separated from the freight train and only 38 of those 51 actually derailed? Sealpaii (talk) 17:18, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use American English
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- C-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- C-Class Ohio articles
- Low-importance Ohio articles
- WikiProject Ohio articles
- C-Class rail transport articles
- Low-importance rail transport articles
- Operations task force articles
- All WikiProject Trains pages
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Selected anniversaries (February 2024)