Talk:Duncan Hames

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is facebook a reliable source[edit]

Duncan is "in a relationship" with Jo Swinson, but the only reference I can find are their facebook pages saying so. Is it a reliable source, given that they are writing about themselves? Richard Gadsden (talk) 13:35, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there's this http://www.joswinson.org.uk/articles/000007/third_time_lucky_as_jo_becomes_youngest_mp.html from Jo's own web site, written in 2005, and then this article http://elections.edelman.co.uk/2010/03/chippenham-the-black-farmer-vs-the-lib-dem-apparatchick/ from Election 2010. So I think it's reliable. (Of course we could just ask them, or friends who know them, but I guess that would be 'Original Research'...) -- dww

And now - engaged. Ref: http://www.libdemvoice.org/hames-swinson-to-wed-20008.html (20 Jun 2010) --dww

A blog, and although better than some, still unacceptable as a source in a biography. Rodhullandemu 23:18, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Duncan Hames. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]