Talk:Czersk

Corrected major improper English terminology Very poor guidance of the English language terminology frequently used with literary dictionairy interpretation.

 http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gmina_Czersk

 Why the links:

  http : // czersk . naszemiasto.pl 
  http : // czersk . naszemiasto . pl/kontakty_adresy

is being blocked by an alleged SPAM filter? Who is the genius behind such idiotic and discriminatory decisions?

(( From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search The page you tried to save was blocked by the spam filter because it contained a link to a blacklisted website. If you didn't add the link (see below), it was probably already in the current version of the page. Alternately, it might have been added by spyware on your computer.

You will need to remove all instances of the blacklisted URL before you can save.

If you believe that the link should not be listed on the spam blacklist, or that the spam filter is mistakenly blocking the edit, please leave a request on the spam blacklist talk page. The following is the section of the page that triggered the filter:

The following text is what triggered our spam filter: http : // czersk . naszemiasto . pl

There is NO whats ever evidence of any intentional or not spam.

Removed a wrong distance from the Capital of Poland (35 km), this Czersk is in Pomeranian region and not in Mazowiecki Voyevodship. The described City of Czersk is close to Gdynia (pomeranian Voyevodship) and not 35 kilometers from Warsaw.

http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czersk Recommend to include the links:

http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powiat_chojnicki

People with poor command of English language need to pay more attention to used English terms as the "translations" using dictionairy are really amusingly distorting the intended meaning; (i.e decay was replaced with deterioration) Decay of the tooth is not equal to deterioration of the castle!

Diatribe[edit]

Whoever wrote this highly POV diatribe (in pidgin English) has not made a worthwhile contribution, in my opinion. Sca 18:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]