Talk:Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A. article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name and location of article[edit]

I've put the article under the title of the 9th Circuit Case. I did this because the Supreme Court decision was a mere per curiam affirmance, and I know that those are normally gathered by term in a single article. Since the vast majority of the article content will relate to the 9th Circuit case, I put it under the 9th Circuit name and I am using a 9th Circuit infobox. If folks think that a move to the Supreme Court case name is better, then I would be happy to support such a move. As of now, the name of the Supreme Court case redirects here. Verkhovensky (talk) 03:29, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern District?[edit]

I am looking at Judge Hatter's November 2011 order ([1]), and it says, clear as day, "United States District Court Eastern District of California." This is despite the case having started in the Central District, where Hatter is judge, and every other reference I know of referring to the Central District. Anyone have a clue? Did Hatter's clerk just use the wrong template, or what? TJRC (talk) 23:18, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

new stuff[edit]

Someone better than me can add this:

http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2015/01/20/11-57137.pdf --Cameron Scott (talk) 09:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kirtsaeng[edit]

This article needs to be rewritten DRASTICALLY in view of the Supreme Court's contrary decision in Kirtsaeng. PraeceptorIP (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]