Talk:Canadian Action Party

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/19070357/Wikipedia-Canadian-Action-Party-25-August-2009-201-am

* * —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.55.11.34 (talk) 12:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dispute whether the LINK on the name of Paul Kemp is correct. President of CAP Paul Kemp is not likely the famous fantasy author. That link should be removed.

* * —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.55.11.34 (talk) 04:53, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am adding an additional "popular vote" column that illustrates, in ridings where voters actually had the choice of voting for the party, what percentage used that opportunity.

Fair use rationale for Image:CAP-PAC.jpg[edit]

Image:CAP-PAC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Various Party Positions with regard to the War of (aka "on") Terror[edit]

I removed this ALL-CAPS comment from the article: (THIS IS NOT THE NDP'S POSITION-- THIS IS A PARTISAN STATEMENT, NOT BASED ON FACT). While I agree this section is currently under referenced and in its present form may not follow NPOV as well as it could, this discussion page is the spot for these types of comments, not the article itself.Garth of the Forest (talk) 18:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Riddled with Conspiracy Lunatics[edit]

This party seems to have morphed into a fringe group with more and more loonies making the cut and most rational people deserting the ship. The belief in "alternative theories" to what really happenned on 9/11 is but one example. In fact they are really only now known as being a fringe party. Should not this stated and documented. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.67.154.249 (talk) 06:23, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do. But please make sure to make edits in line with Wikipedia's policies on neutrality and verifiability. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 11:47, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]