Talk:Binter Mediterráneo Flight 8261

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Accidents

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article[edit]

http://www.unav.es/malofiej/entries/9/020-10/aero6.swf is the flash of an article WhisperToMe (talk) 04:27, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Causes Section Clarification[edit]

In "Causes," it reads that the copilot "forfeited the maneuvers" == I assume this is meant to be read as "executed the maneuvers." As now written, it conveys the opposite meaning (IE, it reads as though he chose not to do the proper maneuver). But because I am not familiar with the subject this is only a presumption. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.195.193.254 (talk) 20:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Attempted landing[edit]

http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20010829-0 // Link to Binter Méditerraneo Crashes at Málaga Airport.

http://www.unav.es/malofiej/entries/9/020-10/aero.html // Reconstruccion del accidente, El Pais

http://www.fomento.gob.es/NR/rdonlyres/F5D4075B-998B-4FC4-AF8A-2E56170E4FFF/7813/2001_048_A1.pdf // Malaga aeropuerto accidente, Final Report 193.64.23.68 (talk) 22:44, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See the El Pais link above: The total missing of the airplane’s nose fuselage can be seen in the small airplane picture. Many meters are completely missing from nose. The airplanes fuselage has shortened many meters because of a very hard nose down impact to ground?

The Final Report does not give any explanation to this?

Instead what is stated on the Final Report of the Accident (la Comisión de Investigación de Accidentes e Incidentes de Aviación Civil), the plane might have gone in full stall situation when performing a single motor go-around maneuver near RWY31 or trying to maintain altitude for overflight or when trying to reach the RWY31.

This assumption is in conflict with the link http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20010829-0 picture http://aviation-safety.net/photos/displayphoto.php?id=20010829-0&vnr=2&kind=C showing over 200 meters sliding of the accident plane. And also the road banister is complete in this picture and not broken as shown before in the other pictures. The accident plane wings might have hit some obstacles before (possible hundreds of meters earlier, before the go-around maneuver).

http://www.1001crash.com/index-page-description-accident-BM_CASA235-lg-2-crash-121.html#bas // accident pictures.

Hard impact from rather high altitude to the ground after stall might give explanation to airplane's huge damages (fuselage, nose). On the other link, Final Report page 72, you can see a picture showing airplane’s completely separated nose windows.

These huge damages to the accident CASA CN-235-200 plane cannot be caused by slide to the main road bank as stated by The Accident Final Report. You can see this accident place at Google Earth coordinates: 36°39'47.00"N 4°29'0.15"W (Street View). It’s not so bad place. After this the airplane would have nose left. 212.226.42.239 (talk) 20:15, 25 March 2013 (UTC) 193.64.23.159 (talk) 15:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC) 193.64.23.159 (talk) 15:55, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Binter Mediterráneo Flight 8261. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100312001828/http://www.unav.es:80/malofiej/entries/9/020-10/aero.html to http://www.unav.es/malofiej/entries/9/020-10/aero.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:11, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]