Talk:Benedict Jones

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Psychologist#Research Psychologists|research psychologist]] The anchor (#Research Psychologists) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled[edit]

I recognize that one may feel quite miffed by someone marking the article as non-notable, but we do not normally delete articles on notable subjects at the subjects request. There is some latitude for the barely notable, see WP:OTRS. Given the attention paid to this work, and the articles in major journals, I however as the reviewing administrator, think the article more than borderline, and will defend it against any attempt to delete. The ultimate decision though, is that of the community as expressed at WP:AFD, not mine. Why not instead simply add a good descriptive paragraph about the work?DGG (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2008 (UTC)