Talk:BBL Drizzy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the instrumental track "BBL Drizzy" is about rumors accusing Canadian rapper Drake of receiving buttock augmentation surgery?

Source: https://www.theguardian.com/music/article/2024/may/09/drake-kendrick-lamar-bbl-drizzy-song

ALT1: ... that American producer Metro Boomin unknowingly sampled a song created with generative artificial intelligence in the instrumental diss track "BBL Drizzy"? Source: https://www.billboard.com/business/tech/metro-boomin-bbl-drizzy-future-ai-sampling-1235682587/
Reviewed:

Created by Liance (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

~Liance^talk 21:07, 13 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: Earwig's clear, long enough, new enough, sourced well, and gtg. The Graun really needs to get its reporting up though, "Metro did something that had yet to be done in this rap battle: he apologized" might be the most damning indictment of J Cole's role in the beef I've seen. AryKun (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Liance, would you do an ALT hook that doesn't mention "rumors accusing" a living person of cosmetic surgery? Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 18:52, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Rjjiii Done. ~Liance^talk 00:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks! Would you approve ALT1 or offer feedback, AryKun? Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instrumental???[edit]

Why does this article repeatedly refer to this as an instrumental when it clearly contains vocals?Ordinary Person (talk) 23:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ye i noticed that too. i made it "instrumental diss track" a while ago but maybe it should just be "diss track beat", perchance. but at the same time this source says instrumental so idk: [1] Freedun (yippity yap) 06:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit, to be Copyedited[edit]

Hey! I decided to copyedit some of this article. I primarily shifted a lot of the information that was originally in the "Track" subsection under "Release" since I felt that a lot of information was being repeated there and could be delegated to other parts of the article, editing as needed while hopefully having the article flow well. Feel free to make any edits or adjustments to what I did and/or make any comments. There are some parts that I'd like to point out that I had trouble on:

"Drake mentioned Ross in the song "Push-Ups".
- More context can definitely be added to this, especially as to what Drake said to Rick Ross. Given what the source (#9) cited to this passage mentions, however, I didn't know how to implement it.
"Ross responded with his diss "Champagne Moments", coining the phrase in the song and on his Instagram story. In response to "Champagne Moments..."
- The double "in response" and "Champagne Moments" feels a bit awkward? No idea how to restructure it to make it less awkward.
I did my best with the in-article citations when moving things around, keeping them attached with the right passages. I did notice that one citation didn't fit with passage and replaced it with a better citation. If someone can double check me and see if everything is cited in the right place, I would appreciate that.

Let me know how I did! Wobox25 (talk) 20:53, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decided to take up the mantle myself and fix what I mentioned in the bullet points. I think the citations/sources are also good as well, possibly. Still feel free to make many edits, adjustments, or comments. Wobox25 (talk) 05:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]