Talk:Aritzia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: JMaccmns.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

From couturevogue 10:09

They no longer sell Juicy Couture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Couturevogue (talkcontribs) 02:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't TNA stand for Talula National Athletics, not "Then Now Always"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.136.250.226 (talk) 04:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JMaccmns (talk) 04:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Article need to be updated with new brands and more official sources JMaccmns (talk) 04:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They do not cary Paradise mine and SIXELEVEN anymore JMaccmns (talk) 04:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article going from bad to worse looks like COI[edit]

This article is starved for reliable independent sources, yet the claim that the business is based on Yoga merchandise, via the repeated, editwarring addition of that Category is now again made along with the repeated addition and alteration of the Navbar Yoga as exercise. The only credible explanation fir this must be conflict of interest, ie an editor is batting for Aritzia not fir Wikipedia. That is wholly Unacceptable. Reliable evidence, independent of the company, must be provided to stare in terms that the retailer exists IN ORDER TO sell yoga apparel, yoga mats, etc; otherwise the claim implied by the Category and Navbar is false. To be clear, having a change of company policy and starting a sideline in yoga pants is NOT sufficient for the category, and a fortiori for the Navbar, which is exclusively for things and people totally tied to Yoga. The article's History section signally does not even mention Yoga, let alone reliably cite evidence that the company was founded, like Lululemon, specially to sell Yoga merchandise. I see no improvement in the article at all, just a desperate clutching at straws not to be dismissed for incompetent work making the page into something more effective as an advertisement for Aritzia. That can't be permitted here. Chiswick Chap (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]