Talk:ArcSoft

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Notability[edit]

I believe the company passes the notability guidelines. A book about video editing (http://safari.oreilly.com/0131001051/ch12) partially focuses on editing video with one of the company's products, ShowBiz.

Also, if you do a Google search for "ArcSoft", it will return many results. ~~Eugene2x ☺ ~~ 02:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Being in google doesn't mean notability. Family Guy Guy 04:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure notability information is in the article itself. If you're pretty sure that the subject meets the guidelines at WP:CORP, you can remove the prod tag yourself. That won't prevent someone from sending it to WP:AFD for consensus, but you'd still have a chance to defend it then. NickelShoe (Talk) 14:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corporation is definitely notable. Many of the leading manufacturers (such as Canon) of scanners, cameras, printers, etc., bundle this company's software with their equipment. —Lowellian (reply) 05:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They just signed a HUGE deal to be included in KODAK software products 1/2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.236.168.65 (talk) 19:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Update or remove please: Arcsoft has been ignoring its customers for over 5 years[edit]

While this company may still seem to exist online - it's been ignoring the many thousands of customers who purchased their products and can no longer activate the programs they purchased, for over 5 years. All emails and online contact with this company continue to be ignored. The last post on their X and Facebook accounts was in 2018. They have no responded to any enquiries from their customers since then which you can see from the numerous requests on Facebook for help.

May I encourage you to update this information so that it's clear this company is NOT supporting its customers and no longer sells any kind of graphics/image programs - and if it does, it's not supporting its customers so is not a legitimate or trustworthy company.

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ArcSoftInc

X: https://twitter.com/ArcSoft

Tzali (talk) 13:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"MediaImpression" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect MediaImpression has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § MediaImpression until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"ArcSoft MediaImpression" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect ArcSoft MediaImpression has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § ArcSoft MediaImpression until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"TotalMedia Theatre" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect TotalMedia Theatre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § TotalMedia Theatre until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"ArcSoft TotalMedia Theatre" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect ArcSoft TotalMedia Theatre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § ArcSoft TotalMedia Theatre until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Arcsoft TotalMedia Theatre" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Arcsoft TotalMedia Theatre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § Arcsoft TotalMedia Theatre until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"PanoramaMaker" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect PanoramaMaker has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § PanoramaMaker until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]