This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
This page is within the scope of the Wikipedia Help Project, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's help documentation for readers and contributors. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. To browse help related resources see the Help Menu or Help Directory. Or ask for help on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you there.Wikipedia HelpWikipedia:Help ProjectTemplate:Wikipedia Help ProjectHelp articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Page moved to Wikipedia:Where to get feedback on an article you've just created. Consensus is clear to move, the issue remained where. There are pluses and minuses for the various names. Let's give this one a try and see if it works. If not, feel free to renominate. If you do so, please read the comments below and any new proposal should address all of the concerns presented below against a proposed new name. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:05, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a very good point Erpert. I would prefer this wording (I think this is what you meant to do, anyway), which is clearer & also solves the obvious problem: Wikipedia:Where to get feedback on ''the'' article you just created. The same problem exists with WP:Why was my page deleted?. I'd like to see both pages subjected to the same scrutiny and policy, for exactly the reason detailed by Erpert. Duff (talk) 06:30, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Suppport move to WikiDonn's version. Current page title is misleading for the reason given by the nominator. Dpmuk (talk) 12:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here the word "just" means "very recently", and is needed to distinguish from articles created longer ago. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Right, but do you think it is necessary? Can this page also pertain to older pages? It reads easier without it, is all - but it's a minor point. Regards, Arbitrarily0(talk) 20:10, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments post relisting.
Support move to something, but would suggest Wikipedia:Where to get feedback on a newly-created article if the original form is to be modified, though I think Wikipedia:New article feedback locations or Wikipedia:New article feedback forums might be better yet as the title.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 11:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.