Wikipedia talk:What isn't grounds for article deletion

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Why I wrote this essay[edit]

I tried to make it not look like a rant. But I'm just sick of people claiming that articles should be deleted, for example, for a lack of sources. If the topic is inappropriate for Wikipedia, just say which guideline applies and thats it! Dark Shikari 18:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So what if there are no sources in existence?[edit]

Yeah... -Amark moo! 01:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Then delete it per WP:V, not WP:CRUFT, since one is policy and the other is not. Spoom^Talk 20:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This page is false[edit]

This page asserts that certain things are or are not valid per policy, and makes false assertions while doing so. What it means is that the sole author of this page wishes that certain nominations were invalid, whereas in fact there's nothing wrong with them. >Radiant< 11:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]