Wikipedia talk:Repainting the Great Wall of China

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Colorful but the metaphor breaks down[edit]

Cute but I don't concur with your conclusions. It doesn't follow that the person who suggests a large change must be the person who completes all of that change, especially if that wasn't what the person was really proposing in the first place. Your Liang is depicted as lazy, but (assuming that he finished his portion of the wall before giving up) his actions are reasonable.

Also consider that there is no real-life equivalent to the barbarian hordes. Articles under disputes of this kind look no different to readers than otherwise. There is no set of external negative consequences to arguments like these. Darkfrog24 (talk) 12:47, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]