Wikipedia talk:Even a stopped clock is right twice a day

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

Comments moved from the essay page[edit]

The comments below were moved from the essay page to this talk page by DesertPipeline (talk) 14:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC) [reply]

So a block isn't a block, and a ban isn't a ban, they're just whatever the blocked or banned contributor feels like abiding by? Cabayi (talk) 11:19, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, blocks and bans exist for a reason, and of course action should be taken against editors in violation of their block/ban. I just think that nuking all their contributions for no other reason than the fact they were made in violation of a block/ban, is counterproductive. The good edits they make are good edits regardless of their author. It comes off as a bit of a WP:BATHWATER thing. PrussianOwl (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's a WP:DENY thing. Cabayi (talk) 12:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't that only be if we kept their disruptive changes? PrussianOwl (talk) 02:19, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using acronyms And actually refer to your reasons 75.117.226.44 (talk) 02:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]