Wikipedia talk:Appeal to authority

Essays Low‑impact

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Wikipedia essays, a collaborative effort to organise and monitor the impact of Wikipedia essays. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion. For a listing of essays see the essay directory.EssaysWikipedia:WikiProject EssaysTemplate:WikiProject EssaysWikiProject Wikipedia essays pages
Low	This page has been rated as Low-impact on the project's impact scale.
	The above rating was automatically assessed using data on pageviews, watchers, and incoming links.

For the message of this essay[edit]

Shouldn't you say that Wikipedia is just a relayer of information, rather than a claimant of truth? Because if you are a relayer of information, you are no arguer. You have to be a claimant to argue for anything. I say this to whoever you are.

As for the content, if a comment thereabout may be included in an essay talk page, to quote an auto mechanic about the best medical treatment for something is not a fallacy. What is a fallacy is believing that it is impossible for a situation to occur where an auto mechanic has and provides the correct said information while a professor of medicine may be ignorant or lies about it. That belief is a logical requirement in saying that the aforementioned act of quoting is a fallacy. In saying that quoting a professor of medicine for the information is not a fallacy as a general statement, the only basis for claiming reliability is the authority or title of the person providing the information. A claim of reliability with such a basis is a fallacy. Myrnamyers (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]