Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/University of Massachusetts Amherst/N603-Theoretical Comparisons in Nursing Science (Summer 2017)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This Course Wikipedia Resources Connect
Questions? Ask us:

contact@wikiedu.org

Course name
N603-Theoretical Comparisons in Nursing Science
Institution
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Instructor
Anna Paskausky
Wikipedia Expert
Ian (Wiki Ed)
Subject
Nursing
Course dates
2017-05-22 00:00:00 UTC – 2017-07-07 23:59:59 UTC
Approximate number of student editors
35


Students will examine and evaluate the components and functions of theory by exploring the role of different types of theory in a practice discipline.

Student Assigned Reviewing
KN603C Self-care, Virginia Henderson
Bkcrow Katherine Kolcaba
Mikenzie33 Katharine Kolcaba
Nurse Radish Synergy model of nursing
Miriam4545 Nursing theory
GStudentZ1995 Madeleine Leininger
Ol!v3G13 Nursing theory Nursing theory
Daplc Nola Pender
ACN574 Integrative medicine
Kjf1118 Comfort
Sam1cha Theory of chronic sorrow
Iya Ayo Nursing theory Nursing Theory
Bassilabualkhon Self-care deficit nursing theory Pressure ulcer
KLC123 Self-care deficit nursing theory
JackieFoote Katharine Kolcaba
JCchild
AnnmarieG
Olifred
Akathm612 Self-care deficit nursing theory
MojoMaja Synergy model
Orcaminor Peplau Interpersonal Relations, Interpersonal relations Mid-range theory
Megburnsrn Nola Pender
Thattil Kolcaba's Theory of Comfort Nursing Theories
ChrisIk
Smfarrington Nursing theory, Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms
Shenurse512 Opioid use disorder
Unguyen17 Cultural marginality theory Food allergy
ElizabethMaryKadar

Timeline

Week 1

Course meetings
Monday, 22 May 2017   |   Tuesday, 23 May 2017   |   Wednesday, 24 May 2017   |   Thursday, 25 May 2017   |   Friday, 26 May 2017
In class - Introduction to the Wikipedia project

Welcome to your Wikipedia project's course timeline. This page will guide you through the Wikipedia project for your course. Be sure to check with your instructor to see if there are other pages you should be following as well.

Your course has also been assigned a Wikipedia Content Expert. Check your Talk page for notes from them. You can also reach them through the "Get Help" button on this page.

To get started, please review the following handouts:

Assignment - Get started on Wikipedia
  • Create an account and join this course page, using the enrollment link your instructor sent you. (To avoid hitting Wikipedia's account creation limits, this is best done outside of class. Only 6 new accounts may be created per day from the same IP address.)
  • It's time to dive into Wikipedia. Below, you'll find the first set of online trainings you'll need to take. New modules will appear on this timeline as you get to new milestones. Be sure to check back and complete them! Incomplete trainings will be reflected in your grade.
  • When you finish the trainings, practice by introducing yourself to a classmate on that classmate’s Talk page.

Week 2

Course meetings
Sunday, 28 May 2017   |   Tuesday, 30 May 2017   |   Wednesday, 31 May 2017   |   Thursday, 1 June 2017   |   Friday, 2 June 2017
Assignment - Evaluate a Wikipedia article

 It's time to think critically about Wikipedia articles. You'll evaluate a Wikipedia article related to the course and leave suggestions for improving it on the article's Talk page. 

  • Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
  • Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings. 
  • Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your paper topic to read and evaluate. You can search for keywords related to your subject on en.wikipedia.org
  • As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these): 
    • Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
    • Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
    • Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
    • Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
    •  Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? 
    • Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
    •  Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? 
    • How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
    • How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
  •  Optional: Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — Iya Ayo (talk) 07:00, 1 July 2017 (UTC). [reply]

Week 3

Course meetings
Sunday, 4 June 2017   |   Monday, 5 June 2017   |   Tuesday, 6 June 2017   |   Wednesday, 7 June 2017   |   Thursday, 8 June 2017
Assignment - Citations in Wikipedia

Familiarize yourself with editing Wikipedia by adding a citation to an article.

First, complete the training module below.

Then, use the Citation Hunt tool, which shows unreferenced statements from articles. First, evaluate whether the statement in question is true! An uncited statement could just be lacking a reference or it could be inaccurate or misleading. Reliable sources on the subject will help you choose whether to add it or correct the statement. 

Week 4

Course meetings
Sunday, 11 June 2017   |   Monday, 12 June 2017   |   Tuesday, 13 June 2017   |   Wednesday, 14 June 2017   |   Thursday, 15 June 2017
Assignment - Add to an article

Now that you are familiar with Wikipedia, take the information you gathered to write your paper and improve the quality of a related article.

Before you begin, please take both trainings below.


In week 2 you selected a topic to evaluate that was related to your research paper. Now, you're going to make a small improvement to that article! 


  • To start, on the Students tab, assign your chosen topic to yourself.
  • Try to add 2-4 new sentences to your article, and cite those statements to reliable sources, as you learned in the online training.
  • If no appropriate page exists yet, consider starting a draft in your sandbox that includes the outline/summary of what the new page could look like.

Week 5

Course meetings
Sunday, 18 June 2017   |   Monday, 19 June 2017   |   Tuesday, 20 June 2017   |   Wednesday, 21 June 2017   |   Thursday, 22 June 2017
Assignment - Optional part 1
draft further improvements to your Wikipedia article

If you'd like to continue working on this project, please complete both of the following OPTIONAL assignments.

First, think back to when you did your article critique & your "add to an article" project. What more can you add to your topic's coverage on Wikipedia? 


Second, compile a list of 3-5 relevant, reliable books, journal articles, or other sources that you can use to support your work. Post that bibliography to the talk page of the article you'll be working on, and in your sandbox. Make sure to check in on the Talk page to see if anyone has advice on your bibliography.

In your sandbox, write about what you plan to contribute to your selected article. This should be a paragraph or two of content with citations. 


Tips for creating a new article

  • Write an outline of that topic in the form of a standard Wikipedia article's "lead section." Write it in your sandbox
    •  A "lead" section is not a traditional introduction. It should summarize, very briefly, what the rest of the article will say in detail. The first paragraph should include important, broad facts about the subject. A good example is Ada Lovelace. See Editing Wikipedia page 9 for more ideas. 
In class - Optional part 2
move your work live!

Once you're ready to move your more substantial draft from your sandbox live remember:

Editing an existing article?

  • NEVER copy and paste your draft of an article over the entire article. Instead, edit small sections at a time.
  • Copy your edits into the article. Make many small edits, saving each time, and leaving an edit summary. Never replace more than one to two sentences without saving! 
  • Be sure to copy text from your sandbox while the sandbox page is in 'Edit' or 'Edit source' mode. This ensures that the formatting is transferred correctly. 


Creating a new article?


Once your draft has been moved live, continue improving the article:

  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 12 to see how to create links from your article to others, and from other articles to your own. Try to link to 3–5 articles, and link to your article from 2–3 other articles. 
  • Read Editing Wikipedia page 15 to review a final check-list before completing your assignment.


If you'd like to add an image to your article:

  • Before you start, review the Illustrating Wikipedia handbook, or see Editing Wikipedia pages 10–11. 
  • When you've reviewed those pages, take the training linked below.
  • See if there is already an image available to help illustrate the topic you've chosen. When you're ready to start finding images, remember: Never grab images you find through an image search, or those found on Instagram, Tumblr, Reddit, Imgur, or even so-called "Free image" or "free stock photo" websites. Instead, you'll want to find images with clear proof that the creator has given permission to use their work. Many of these images can be found on search.creativecommons.org or commons.wikimedia.org
  • If you want to upload or add your own image to an article, remember: don't just upload an image to Wikipedia. Instead, upload it to Wikipedia's sister site for images, Wikimedia Commons. For instructions, read through the Illustrating Wikipedia handbook.