Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Dokdo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dokdo[edit]

Resolved:

Parties did not demonstrate good-faith.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

Involved parties[edit]

Articles involved[edit]

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:[edit]

  • None.

Issues to be mediated[edit]

  • The article's wordings in the introductory section.

Additional issues to be mediated[edit]

  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate[edit]

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
  1. Agree. (Wikimachine 06:51, 20 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]
  2. Agree.--Opp2 09:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Agree --DandanxD 08:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Agree. -- Ginnre 06:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Agree -- Good friend100 03:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Agree.--Endroit 18:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]

Accepted

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] 02:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to take this case. But I want to know your opinion about the type of mediation. Please let me know, you want private (via e-mails) or public (on Wikipedia itself) mediation. Thanks, Shyam (T/C) 16:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'd like the mediation to be open. (Wikimachine 00:03, 3 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]
    • So, if all of us agree with public mediation then please proceed to talk page. Shyam (T/C) 06:45, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.