Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Ascended master

Ascended master[edit]

Mediation of this dispute has been completed. The case pages should not be edited.

To report a problem with the outcome of this case, contact the Mediation Committee.
If additional mediation proceedings are required, a new mediation request should be filed.
These case pages should not be edited, even to correct article content problems. Case pages are not indexed by search engines.

Resolved:

Inactivity

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 18:24, October 30 2006 (UTC)

Involved parties[edit]

Articles involved[edit]

Ascended master

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:[edit]

WP:RFC ~~I didn't notice this one on the list, however, the editor in question seems to be little interested in discussion.~~ Page did go through RFC: [1]. My bad. Thanks Hele!
WP:AN/I ~~Is ANI the right place for content disputes?~~ 3RR incident leading to 12 hour block

Issues to be mediated[edit]

Should the NPOV tag be present on the article?
Are the opposing links appropriate for inclusion?

Additional issues to be mediated[edit]

( N / A )

Parties' agreement to mediate[edit]

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.

Agree - Richfife 18:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree - Aburesz 22:16, 8 November 2006
Agree. Quendus 19:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree --Vindheim 20:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Hele 7 12:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee[edit]

Accept

For the Mediation Committee, ^demon^{[yell at me]} 01:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I will mediate this, assuming User:Aburesz is willing to join. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that everyone has agreed to the mediation, please indicate whether you would prefer public or private mediation. Thanks! --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 13:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not very familiar with the procedure, so I browsed around and found that "The mediation process is private and the mediator and disputants are expected to keep the process confidential." [2]. See also [3]. Please correct me if this is not true. Hele 7 09:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like it to be private it is private. However some prefer it to be public therefore I gave that option. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 13:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have agreed to Mediation, and welcome this opportunity to restore a neutral, academic and informative atmosphere to the article page on the topic of "Ascended Masters" - which is NOT unique to any one person or religious organization. Aburesz 16:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This case is now being mediated by email. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is this mediation still ongoing?[edit]

The notice has been re-inserted on Talk:Ascended_master that this mediation is still ongoing! Is it? If so, what is going on? Aburesz 17:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.