Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 July 25
Another's opinion would be deeply appreciated. Thanks in advance.
~~86.22.210.53 (talk) 10:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Excellent article. Consider adding a few more links to the article, but other than that I think it's OK. Chevymontecarlo - alt 05:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Any feedback would be welcome. Thanks
~~Northmetpit (talk) 12:12, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
I think you've done a good job. :) The article is well-written and has categories added to it. As it is, I think it's got probably the minimum amount of references necessary, so if you could find one or two more, that would make it even better. But that's not to detract from your work; well done! I'll remove the {{unreviewed}} tag for you. Best, Pianotech Talk to me!/Contribs 23:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Nice article, but as Pianotech says, try and find more reliable references and add them to the article, as it's a bit lacking. Chevymontecarlo - alt 05:54, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Any feedback appreciated.
~~Scarletpimpernels (talk) 12:56, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Continue to add reliable references to the article, if you can, because at the moment it's a bit lacking. Chevymontecarlo - alt 08:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
I will thank you to send me your opinion.
~~Sungkha777 (talk) 02:09, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Nice, a bit complicated for me but work on the references. Maybe try and add a few more. For more information you can take a look at WP:Reliable references. Chevymontecarlo - alt 08:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)