Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Arachnis Picta

Arachnis Picta[edit]

It seems to me an image of a high quality. My only concern is the out of focus forelegs in the foreground and background. Is it worth putting it for nomination in spite of this obvious flaw?

Nominated by: Mostlyharmless (talk) 04:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

On encyclopedic terms this picture is quite good to show the subjects and has substantial detail that's welcome in a macro. I do guarantee you that people will oppose the background for being white but to what degree I cannot say... I would probably try this at PFC to see if people enjoy it enough. About the leg being out of focus that's probably fine it's a minuscule part of the photograph compared to the part that is in focus. victorrocha (talk) 21:24, 2 july 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, nominated. Mostlyharmless (talk) 04:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seconder