Wikipedia:Peer review/Zoophilia/archive1

Zoophilia[edit]

A failed featured article candidate. Needs a check on neutrality (frequently disputed, see talk page) and how this can best be improved. Further points of interest are if the terms zoophilia and bestiality should be in one single article or two separate articles as the terms are not synonymous as some people incorrectly assume and what images would be fitting for such an article as some see the current artwork as portraying a too colorful and unrealistic image. Any comment is welcome though! BabyNuke 14:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 20:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is 110kb and a mess. I am not even going to try to read it unless it is considerably reduced. The order of sections at the bottom (notes, external links, category template) is also wrong - look at a featured article to see it done correctly. Trebor 23:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Try to break it into more article and just a summary in the main article. For example points related to Mythology, History, Religion can form a separate article Doctor Bruno 00:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]