Wikipedia:Peer review/Xerox/archive1

Xerox[edit]

I recently did a major cleanup on this one, some rewriting, etc. It's not in a bad state, but needs improving, any ideas ? (except for references, I know it needs more references). — Wackymacs 14:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 19:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
More inline citations are of course welcomed. 'Current products' and 'Corporate structure' are stub sections and need expantion, while half of the article is taken by 'Alleged accounting irregularities', reflecting the somewhat 'newsy' nature of what many editors like to write about. The article should be expanded until 'Alleged accounting irregularities' are only one of many large sections. Consider contacting the company, maybe they will send some of their staff to work on it?--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus talk} 16:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]