Wikipedia:Peer review/San Juan, Puerto Rico/archive1

San Juan, Puerto Rico[edit]

This article has been under work by me and several other members of WikiProject Puerto Rico and we have worked hard on raising this page to where we believe it should be in the process managing to get it pass Good Article. To reviewers please judge this article as if you where judging a Featured Article Candidate cause that is where we are headed, any concerns presented will be attended by me or by any other member of WikiProject Puerto Rico, thanks for your time. -凶 13:55, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some points to consider:

Go easy on the sub-headings. Some, like "Subjected to attacks", break the narrative flow (they are unnecessary) and some, like "Subdivisions", don't have enough meat to justify itself ("Subdivisions" is only two sentences long).
In "Demographics" place the boxes to one side and allow the text to flow around them. Having them in the middle creates a lot of white space on both sides.
What source did the climate figures come from? Please provide a footnote.
A map of the city, with such features as roads, rail, watercourses, landmarks, etc. would be great.
The "Sports" section only consists of a list and a box. Prose is encouraged.
Personal opinion: I don't like "Notable residents" sections. Little info, little relevance, a lot of space.
This link [1] provides a good guide of sections and content that could be valuable to add. --maclean 06:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We Got Homework, i definitely agree with points mentioned above.

We should look at other cities articles, the Charts we have look like big rocks that we have to climb over, we still got an overdose of References, Miami with three times more population has only a third of the References, Las Angeles 10 times more a handful for its size, most of ours should go to External links, we're out of balance! it seems we are just filling-in to make article seem longer or for lack of info, hey guys'n gals, Where’s The Meat?, We have to look into having sections like:

Arts, Culture and Fine Arts
Economy
Tourism
Parks and recreation
Government
Education
Ecology
Bibliography

These are all things We Stand Out (or we should). San Juan shines when we get into music, (Education section) and we don't just play the guitar and drums, we excel in wind instruments amongst others but zilch, why are we in such a hurry to get a GA nomination when so much stuff is missing, how did we get a GA nomination just bogs my mind, lets make this a World Class Article, lets get the homework done ~ Moebiusuibeom-en 17:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for reviewing, I will get to work now. -凶 19:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lets continue - Moebiusuibeom-en 19:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So much silence, any commentaries? Did some adjustments in Transportation section, added more “Meat”

Also added positive aspect of Tren Urbano and some Link shuffling, moved link about negative aspects of Tren Urbano and placed it in Tren's Urbano article where "i believe" it should be, (let me know thoughts!) sort of hid the truth, or in other words if reader wants more detailed info please refer to Main article: Tren Urbano in this case. furthermore articles line; "2006 has reported a 7.5% increase in ridership over 2005" should have a link, news is available in el Nuevo Día but is not digitalisized!

Who knows how to place Demographics charts on right side as per peer view suggestions?! Hey, lets keep fine tuning Moebiusuibeom-en 16:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I tried, but the format seems to be failing, I presume it's because of the way the tables are constructed I think we should be using graphs to illustrate this, they take less space and look better. -凶 20:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes. I've tried too, try using graphs then, sounds like a good idea!~ Moebiusuibeom-en 21:43, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is what Peer review maclean may mean:

Denton, Texas[edit]

Notable Residents[edit]

Denton's position as a cultural and educational center for the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex has resulted in many notable people having resided in the city.

Who's going to do it?! ~ Moebiusuibeom-en 22:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can take care of that, can you look for the graphs? I can't believe Wikipedia doesn't have a code for graphs, we need to look for them in books and I'm short on that area. -凶 22:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The biggest problem with the "Notable residents" section (now list-article) is that it was unreferenced. Each person should have a footnote indicating what their relationship is with the city (to illustrate the relevance). The article is looking good. That is the first time I've seen show/hide used with charts. --maclean 09:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Further comments @ User talk:Dark Dragon Flame ~ Moebiusuibeom-en 16:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]