Wikipedia:Peer review/Jurassic Park franchise/archive1

Jurassic Park franchise[edit]

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to know what kind of things this article would need to be an FA.

Thanks,

Limetolime 17:45, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A few suggestions:

Separate information about Jurassic Park IV from the "Films" section -- at first glance, it would seem that a film had already been made about it. It'd be better at the end of the article in a "Future" section.
- Done -- By me. Limetolime 21:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Provide some prose about the box office performances of the three films, such as the descending trend (using reliable sources, of course).
Provide some prose about the critical reaction to the three films. A good idea would be to look at reviews for the third film, which will usually go back and comment on previous films. If this doesn't work out, try to find reviews from film critics that have watched all the films and string them together to reflect their opinions.
- Done -- By me. Limetolime 21:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - This hasn't been done. I'd refer to the prose in Spider-Man film series#Critical reaction to show what I mean. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Provide some prose for the "Video games" and "Books" section -- just look at that respective article and provide a summary about what exists there.
- Done -- By me. Limetolime 21:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The paragraphs for the second and third films could be expanded somewhat.
- Done -- By me. Limetolime 21:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe a Development section could be created, not for the specific productions of the films, but why Jurassic Park was made, why they decided to follow up with The Lost World, and again with Jurassic Park III. You may need to utilize print sources for this -- not all your answers will be online.

Let me know if you have any questions! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:52, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 19:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Given that the title of the topic isn't really "Jurassic Park franchise" but really "the franchise Jurassic Park", shouldn't the article title be: "Jurassic Park (franchise)", like Friday the 13th (franchise) or Terminator (franchise)? BIGNOLE (Contact me) 22:04, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]