Wikipedia:Peer review/Go Daddy/archive1

Go Daddy

I would like to get this article up to snuff to become a Feature Article. Ardenn 19:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

• Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, years without full dates generally should not be linked. For example, January 2006 should not be linked, instead change it to January 2006. Also, please note WP:BTW and WP:CONTEXT, which state that years with full dates should be linked. For example, February 28, 2006, should be come February 28, 2006.

• Images with fair use tags need fair use rationales - please see WP:FUC. Several images are missing fair use rationales.

• Please provide WP:CITE information for references/footnotes. See also WP:CITE/ES; templates like {{Cite web}} and {{Cite book}} may be useful here.

• This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.

• There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.

*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, years without full dates should not be linked. Every single image in the article needs a fair use rationale - see WP:FUC. The references need WP:CITE information: see WP:CITE/ES and {{Cite web}}. Sections like "Corporate giving" are too short and should be either expanded or merged.Just see the above. Thanks, AndyZ _t 19:57, 19 May 2006 (UTC) 23:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The foundation is there for a good article but two things I would like to see expanded are:

1. Company history, specifically its origin/foundation.
2. Awards, specifically an explanation about why it won the awards (ie. fastest-growing in terms of what...revenue, profit, employees, capital, customers?) and what the signifacance of the award is (ie. who is giving the award...business comunity, industry review journal?). Peer Review 19:48, 21 May 2006 (UTC)