Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Red Hot Chili Peppers/1

Red Hot Chili Peppers[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Not listed Pyrotec (talk) 18:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Been a while since this article has been re-assessed, neesd to be a GA after much editing in recent years. <unsigned comment added by 16:40, 14 July 2013‎ Zeddman123 (talk | contribs)‎ >

So what has a that to do with it? The article has not been nominated at WP:GAN since March 2007. It's not going to be a GA unless it is both nominated at WP:GAN and awarded GA status. It was submitted twice for GA in March 2007, six days apart, and it failed both times. Quite correctly so, in my opinion. Opening a WP:GAR is not an appropriate cause of action for an article that was correctly failed twice over five years ago at WP:GAN. However, looking at the article's recent history, there are signs of edit warring in both June and July 2013, so it if it was submitted now to GAN it might / could be failed on the WP:WIAGA, clause 5: stability. Pyrotec (talk) 19:37, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that there's no reason to contest a six-year-old fail here. I'd suggest simply nominating at GAN when you think it's ready, per the standard procedure. -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:18, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]