Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Haitian boy receiving treatment following 2010 earthquake

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Haitian boy receiving treatment following 2010 earthquake[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2010 at 19:05:01 (UTC)

Original - A Haitian boy receiving treatment at an improvised medical clinic, from the United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti following the 2010 Haiti earthquake
Reason
An exceptionally striking and illustrative image.
Articles in which this image appears
2010 Haiti earthquake
FP category for this image
Natural phenomena/Others
Creator
Logan Abassi
  • Support as nominator --Sir Richardson (talk) 19:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Some random kid in some random place with some random injury. Also jpg artefacts. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 20:36, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • That's an unnecessarily inflammatory and, frankly, stupid thing to say. I urge you to retract it. Chick Bowen 04:35, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      • Please discuss the image, you're free to add your vote with your reasons. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 09:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        • The image is about a somewhat recent event that had a lot of casualties and got a lot of media coverage. You could've made a case about how you feel the image does or doesn't have value to the article, instead you just sounded flippant and insensitive. --I'ḏOne 00:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The sorts of injuries that this patient has presented with are fairly typical of an earthquake - you'd see a fair amount of bruises, abrasions and blunt trauma. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 11:20, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Then doesn't that make the case that it is a good depiction of the typical injuries suffered by those in a notable event, and thus, it is a nice representation of the pain and suffering caused by the notable event. I am very surprised that people are rejecting it on EV grounds. Remember (talk) 15:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that would be a valid argument, yes. I may still vote on this later if I find I have strong feelings about this one way or the other. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 20:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, I do kind of agree with what Aaadddaaammm is saying. It's a nice press-type shot, but it's not uber encyclopedic. J Milburn (talk) 12:25, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Not exactly the best image. MC10 (TCGBL) 21:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 19:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]