Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Beatles discography/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Chrishomingtang 19:52, 19 October 2009 [1].
The Beatles discography[edit]
- Nominator(s): Discographer (talk) 02:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured list because...this discography is well-ready and worthy-enough of being nominated, as it is absolutely complete, entirely true of said information, and corrected of all errors, as well as much-appreciated in appearance by myself and all my peers who have helped me on this discographical project. --Discographer (talk) 02:10, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Glaring issue - Having coloured tables is a major change, as discussed here. Consensus has been reached between the main contributors of the page, but a request at WP:Discog hasn't really attracted any further edits from fellow regular discographers not involved. I propose that there is consensus seeked at both WP:Accessibility and MOS:DISCOG before we go promoting one of the most popular discographies with an against guidelines, previously unused and dominant method. k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 11:27, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: As a recent contributor to the article, I won't state whether I support or not. However, I would recommend that the nominator withdraws the nomination as the discography is still very much a work in progress. There are unsourced chart positions, the singles' certifications are incomplete, the video directors are incomplete and unsourced, the notes at the end of some of the tables are formatted differently from table to table, and the singles table doesn't follow any standard layout I've seen in a discography. There's still a lot of work to be done. --JD554 (talk) 12:07, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.