Comments
- Interestingly our article on their "eponymous" album variously refers to it as The Red Hot Chili Peppers. Is the "The" needed there/here and does it still make it strictly eponymous if the album name is (if subtly) different from the band name?
- The official title of the album is The Red Hot Chili Peppers, according to Allmusic [2]. I'm not sure why the article is called "Red Hot Chili Peppers (album)" here on Wikipedia. Allmusic also refers to the album as their "self-titled debut" in the band's biography (second paragraph, third sentence) [3]. Personally, I believe that the "The" is needed to differentiate between the album and the band.
- "?.[6]" could you just confirm that the WP:MOS is okay with consecutive "end of sentence" markers such as . and ?
- I didn't find anything on the actual Manual of Style guidelines; however, I did start a new discussion on the talkpage for extra help.
- Refs which pick a single page should say "p." not "pp.", e.g. refs 8 & 10.
- And page ranges in the references need en-dash to separate them, not a hyphen, per WP:DASH.
- "and his drug addiction, abruptly quit the band in May" not sure you need to repeat "the band" here.
- That's what I was thinking. Done.
- "did not last very long" -> "was brief"?
- "that "The chemistry wasn't ..." I don't think WP:MOS likes the capital T there. Check WP:MOSQUOTE.
- Maybe consider an {{as of}} for the "Current" lineup?
- In the "Years active" section? And would it be (for Anthony Kiedis, for example): "1983–1986, 1986 onward As of 2010[update]"?
- Well, definitely in the intro the current lineup, don't think you need the second. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh! I understand now. Thank you! Done.
- First table unsortable, second table sortable. Any reason why not both?
I honestly have no idea. I'm not the best with tables, and for some odd reason, I used the exact table format for both. I actually copied and pasted the tables from another featured list and just changed the information. So, any help regarding that would be appreciated. Nevermind. Done.
- Looks like between us we're getting there. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Just make sure the {{sortname}} template is used for everyone (including Flea!). The Rambling Man (talk) 19:53, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That's another problem I've been having. {{sortname}} does not allow a nickname or middle name to be present, unless I'm doing something wrong. I'll try again, but if I need help, I won't hesitate to ask.
- I think I've done it. Have a look and see if it's what you expected... The Rambling Man (talk) 20:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow, you're awesome. That's exactly what I wanted done! Thank you so much. WereWolf (talk) 20:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Former touring musicians table is a little odd - make the image col width the same as the image width, reference col seems way too wide...
I'll try again. I've been meaning to fix that table for a while, but I just don't know how. Take a look at the table now. I think I found the problem... Nevermind. You beat me to it. Haha. WereWolf (talk) 20:09, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Timeline fails WP:ACCESS as you use just colour to differentiate between instruments.
- I'm not quite sure what you mean, but I'll read over that and ask for help if I need it. WereWolf (talk) 19:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's to do with leaving only colour to distinguish between things in a diagram, it works against colour-blind people, so ACCESS tends to support using both colour and a symbol... The Rambling Man (talk) 19:48, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Where do I find the symbols? WereWolf (talk) 20:03, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm, this could be tricky. Not sure how the Timeline graphic will support symbols and colour. To be honest, I'm not sure if the timeline is strictly necessary. A lot of sports FLCs/recent FLs actually don't have timelines but do use colour and symbols together to satisfy WP:ACCESS. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So, if I did remove this timeline, would I still have to combine the colours and the symbols? If so, how'd I do that? WereWolf (talk) 20:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It's just the timeline that's at fault, the rest of the article is fine. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:14, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay. I'll remove the timeline. Done. WereWolf (talk) 20:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|