Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Local Nature Reserves in Kent/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 30 May 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Local Nature Reserves in Kent[edit]

Featured list candidates/List of Local Nature Reserves in Kent/archive1

Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 13:46, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the latest in my nominations of lists of Local Nature Reserves, and is in the same format as other FLs such as Suffolk and Essex. Dudley Miles (talk) 13:46, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Courcelles (talk) 21:04, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*"The county town in Maidstone." This is not a complete sentence.

Corrected typo. It should be "The county town is Maidstone." Dudley Miles (talk) 20:42, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANd that's all I'm seeing, actually, this is good work. Courcelles (talk) 17:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the review. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:42, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Quality work. Courcelles (talk) 21:04, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support I have read it, and cannot find much in the way of corrections. The following are minor points.

Perhaps you can change "has diverse fauna and flora" to "has a diverse fauna and flora" to be consistent with other usages (same with "in diverse ground flora").

Pollarding could be linked as it is not a common word.

Volucella inanis is Latin and should thus be italicized.

Yellow horned-popies should not be capitalized.

Great work! Mattximus (talk) 13:50, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Mattximus. All done. Dudley Miles (talk) 19:26, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Rodw Another great list which follows the format used elsewhere. A few minor bits:

There is slight variation in date format in the references ie some use "from the original on 2018-05-15" & others "from the original on 15 May 2018".

Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References 51 & 59 use sfn for Ratcliffe with page nos but ref 67 writes it out in full - any reason?

Fixed. I missed 67 when regularising the format. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not really an issue for FL criteria but I'm intrigued why the map for Haysden Country Park is not available on MAGIC?

This is an issue which keeps coming up. NE depends of local authorities to supply details of LNRs they have designated, and they hardly ever seem able to fix errors and omissions - I suspect because there is often no longer anyone working for the local authority who know anything about LNRs. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find anything else to nit-pick about.— Rod ^talk 07:40, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rodw. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I can now Support as meeting the FLC criteria.— Rod ^talk 09:25, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another quality entry in this series. Promoting. --Pres N 02:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.