Wikipedia:Featured article review/Representative peer/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was kept 07:41, 8 April 2007.

Representative peer[edit]

Review commentary[edit]

Message left at Emsworth. LuciferMorgan 20:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC) Messages left at Scotland, Ireland, British Government, UK notice board, and Peerage. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:11, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another Emsworth work, needs some inline citations to keep it at Featured Article status. Judgesurreal777 22:24, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Inline citations are not specifically required, but excellent as it is, the article lacks sources in general. I'm puzzled by the sentence "Following its disestablishment in 1871, the Church of Ireland ceased to send spiritual representatives". Ceoil 21:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    Just so you know, they are required, as has been discussed on this page in the past. :) All the best, Judgesurreal777 21:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    They are not specifically required. They are de facto inevitable. Marskell 13:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • All of the cited sources are online (except for the 1911 EB). I suspect that dinky footnotes could be added if one so wished. But what needs inline citation? -- ALoan (Talk) 18:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The section on Scotland has not one inline citation. That would be a good start I think. Judgesurreal777 19:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary[edit]

Suggested FA criteria concern is insufficient citations (1c). Marskell 13:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 09:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove Judgesurreal777 19:51, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove per above. — Deckiller 04:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove per 1c. Jay32183 20:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove per 1c—Pity. Tony 08:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I realise this is late in the day, but can this be held for another day or two. Ceoil 14:07, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tell us soon. I was just about to close it, but won't. Marskell 14:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've finished citing where I though it was needed; though fact tags are welcome. Ceoil 20:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Looks a ton better now. Judgesurreal777 20:11, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/Representative_peer/archive1&oldid=1078812086"