Wikipedia:Featured article review/Original Stories from Real Life/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC) [1].

Original Stories from Real Life[edit]

Notified: WikiProject Books, WikiProject Children's literature, WikiProject Women writers, WikiProject Women in Green, 2021-03-02, 2022-05-11

Review section[edit]

I am nominating this featured article for review because there are concerns about uncited text and original research. SandyGeorgia raised these issues on the article's talk page in March 2021, and the concerns have not been resolved. The original FAC nominator is deceased so I will not leave a notice on their talk page, and xtools says there are not other major contributors yet. Z1720 (talk) 13:32, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here's what I noticed:

As a literary work, shouldn't it have a {{infobox book}}? Its omission is pretty glaring here.
which claimed that women should not be taught to reason since they were formed for men's pleasure -- citation is mid-sentence, which I believe MOS disallows
[citation needed] at the end of the same paragraph
[original research] tags all over the place
Massive overquoting in "Illustrations" section
"see the Blake archive for the different versions of Blake's illuminated manuscripts. Retrieved on 17 April 2007." -- is verbiage like this allowed in footnotes?

Definitely needs some work. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:09, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC, no significant improvements. Hog Farm _Talk 04:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move to FARC, nothing happening. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:38, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section[edit]

Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and original research. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delist, no improvement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, improvements have not occurred. Hog Farm _Talk 13:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per the problems I found. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:07, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist no progress on addressing issues raised above. Z1720 (talk) 04:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. Tagged for unsourced statements and original research. DrKay (talk) 11:21, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.