Wikipedia:Featured article review/Constitution of Belarus/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 3:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC) [1].
Constitution of Belarus[edit]
- Notified: Zscout370, WikiProject Belarus, WikiProject Law, WikiProject Politics, diff for talk page notification
- See this discussion; additional notifications to Jabbi. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:17, 1 November 2021 (UTC) [reply]
Review section[edit]
I am nominating this featured article for review because of Bumbubookworm's note two weeks ago that "This article just states/summarises the terms of the constitution without any legal analysis on case law etc. It is therefore not comprehensive under the requirements of a featured article. There are textbooks out there and there have been constitutional law cases also". I'd add that the article doesn't cite available scholarly sources in English so that's another reason to doubt the comprehensiveness. (t · c) buidhe 23:22, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- And here's the textbook of Belarusian constitutional law and the log of cases that I was referring to. Basically someone would need to actually write the content of this FA, unfortunately Bumbubookworm (talk) 04:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note to Coords: additional notification to Jabbi was made on 27 October by Buidhe. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:19, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC, needs quite a bit more to be comprehensive. < 15 sentences of combined material for judicial review and criticism together; a FA on a nation's constitution really needs secondary legal analysis to be truly comprehensive. Hog Farm Talk 20:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section[edit]
- Issues raised in the review section largely concern comprehensiveness. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:14, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no improvement (t · c) buidhe 22:45, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues not addressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - no significant engagement, major comprehensiveness issues. Hog Farm Talk 21:41, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.