Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by Ucucha 01:45, 26 August 2011 [1].
South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut[edit]
South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating this for featured article because this article has a lot of good sources, good images, and well written. Cowik (talk) 01:51, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- comment - Hi, you hadn't added the FAC template to the article talk page, I've put one on for you but you should really have done this yourself. Also, have you consulted any of the regular editors of this article prior to nomination? It doesn't look like you have made all that many edits to the article. Coolug (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- What makes this a reliable source? This? (needs to be formatted)
- Also, this needs to be formatted with {{cite web}} as well
- Sources 60, 61 and 62 need reformatting as well.
- Source 74 needs to list the original publisher, not web.archive.org.
- Echo Coolug's comments about consulting the regular authors.--Tærkast (Discuss) 16:35, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose on images: File:LaResistance.jpg is adding nothing to the article, and has a very poor rationale. It should be removed. File:South Park - Bigger, Longer & Uncut.jpg is practically exactly the same as the poster, so should also be removed. For reference, while there is something of an "automatic" allowance for a non-free album cover on an article about the album, but that doesn't extend to other related articles, whether or not there is an article on the album. File:KennyUnhooded.jpg is being used in a section that doesn't even mention the character, let alone discuss how he looked at that particular time. Again, the lack of a decent rationale means it is difficult to assess the usage. File:SPMovieBluRay.jpg is in no way an important image; we can understand the article without seeing this cover. The rationale claims that it is used "To show the reader that this well known movie has been released on Blu-ray." We don't need a non-free image to "show" that it was released- explaining that it was released and citing reliable sources is fine. File:SouthParkbiggerlongeruncut.jpg is justified, but, again, needs a better rationale. The other images are fine, copyrightwise, but the three images together will cause hell on small screens, and seeing File:RATED R.svg is hardly useful... J Milburn (talk) 23:33, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.