Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Karachi/archive1

(fixing fac nom for submitter.) Rlevse 19:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object Has citation needed tags, external jumps, and inconsistent ref formats. Rlevse 19:37, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object (for now) per above and overall it feels very undercited. Some sections missing footnotes whats so ever while some statements definetely require a citation like "Karachi has the highest literacy rate in Pakistan". - Tutmosis 20:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object (for now) The biggest problem is the lack of citations. It is a very interesting article, and quite enjoyable to read, but I'm not sure it has quite reached featured article quality yet. Even though it needs some work, it is much better now than it was before. Good job to those who have been working on it. HeBhagawan 21:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Something I miss is maps. It would be nice if we could see where the city is located on a map and preferably also some of the basic layout of the city in another map. 22:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Some of the fields documented in the lead template are not supported by the template itself, which is why footnote 1a doesn't appear and doesn't go anywhere. Gimmetrow 15:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template is somewhat fixed. Gimmetrow 16:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Object: Needs in-line citations and references. Yes, there are a few, but WAY not enough for such a big article. A "Further Reading" section would be more than appropriate for such an article. Evan^{(Salad dressing is the milk of the infidel!)} 19:00, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]