Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Good log/April 2010

The Fame[edit]

The Fame

8 articles

"Just Dance"

"Poker Face"

"Eh, Eh (Nothing Else I Can Say)"

"LoveGame"

"Paparazzi"

"Beautiful, Dirty, Rich"

The Fame Ball Tour

I'm nominating these eight articles for Good topic as i believe they are comprehensive and denotes the best in Wikipedia. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - comprehensive, as far as I can tell - rst20xx (talk) 17:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Meets the criteria. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:15, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 22:18, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crystal Clear x3 23:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great job! Andrzejbanas (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -MBK₀₀₄ 23:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive! The leftorium 09:36, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Gaga may be a fraud, but I can't hold that against the articles ;) Corn.u.co.pia • Disc.us.sion 08:03, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lion class battlecruisers[edit]

Lion class battlecruisers

3 articles

HMS Lion

HMS Princess Royal

I am nominating these three articles as a Good Topic because all are GA-class.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - rst20xx (talk) 17:47, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -MBK₀₀₄ on the iPhone 20:31, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice work. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Parsecboy (talk) 02:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cam ^(Chat) 03:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The Bushranger (talk) 23:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 19:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Radetzky class battleships[edit]

Radetzky-class battleships

4 articles

SMS Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand

SMS Radetzky

SMS Zrinyi

Me, Parsecboy and White Shadows are nominating this for a GT because we feel that we have done all the work necesary to get them all to GA's. We got half of them done in one day after I moved Erzherzog to mainspace. I hope this passes, and I'll warn those two right now. Thanks. Buggie111 (talk) 19:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support -MBK₀₀₄ 20:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - but with quite a low number of ships in total, I would advocate there being just one big Austo-Hungarian topic, once the others are up to scratch. Like the German battlecruisers topic - rst20xx (talk) 22:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. However, in the mean time, I belive that this is a suitable GTC.--White Shadows ^{you're breaking up} 23:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right, but eventually, every single battleship article will be one big FT, so even the BC FT will be merged in. We're starting small and merging things up as we can. Parsecboy (talk) 10:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I know...it's a slow process. (If only they had Operation Majestic U-boat....)--White Shadows ^{you're breaking up} 21:48, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, once we get done with the BBs and BCs, we'll need something to do :) Parsecboy (talk) 02:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen the "PHase layout" section in the page. We need to get the armor, the commadners the engagements and so forth also to GA's and FA"s. Buggie111 (talk) 02:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I meant once OMT is complete. Parsecboy (talk) 20:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly then we'll be doing Operation Majestic Bird Farms! - The Bushranger (talk) 23:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Nice job. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Cam ^(Chat) 03:36, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The Bushranger (talk) 23:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 19:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spirit Squad[edit]

Spirit Squad

6 articles

File:Spirit-Squad.jpg

NiciVampireHeart and I are nominating the topic Spirit Squad as a Good Topic. The Spirit Squad was a professional wrestling faction in WWE, comprised of Kenny Dykstra (as Kenny), Johnny Jeter (as Johnny), Nick Mitchell (as Mitch), Nick Nemeth (as Nicky), and Michael Brendli (as Mikey). All six articles in the topic are of Good article status. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ and -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Passes criteria.--WillC 05:57, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - good to see a slightly larger wrestling topic! :) rst20xx (talk) 16:04, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. (I was going to comment on lack of interlinking, but I saw it on the bottom!) ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -MBK₀₀₄ 22:27, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crystal Clear x3 00:43, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 15:33, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Judaism in Rugrats[edit]

Judaism in Rugrats

3 articles

"A Rugrats Passover"

"A Rugrats Chanukah"

The accumulation of about a half-a-year's worth of research, compilation, and nominations brings me to this. All articles are GAs, except for "A Rugrats Chanukah" which passed its FAC last December. I believe all criteria is met here, so there shouldn't be any problems. The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 15:04, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I think the topic should be renamed to the more general "Judaism in Rugrats", as I don't feel any extra articles would need including under that name (unless I'm missing something?). That'd just about be general enough in scope, IMO. Also the main article needs to be linked to on {{Rugrats}} - rst20xx (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 01:04, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - as I said, I think this just about is okay, considering how perfectly the subarticles fit the lead article. Good luck with the upcoming FAC - rst20xx (talk) 01:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -MBK₀₀₄ 22:26, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Cool topic. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 12:57, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 18:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brandenburg class battleships[edit]

Brandenburg-class battleship

5 articles

SMS Brandenburg

SMS Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm

SMS Weißenburg

SMS Wörth

Germany's first class of ocean-going pre-dreadnought battleships, built in the 1890s. Parsecboy (talk) 02:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support -MBK₀₀₄ 03:02, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice job. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! Staxringold _talk^contribs 02:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Impressive. — Hun ter Ka hn 00:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Just about to nominate, thinking you hadn't. Omt is turning out so well... Buggie111 (talk) 01:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Eagerly waiting for the day when OMT will turn into OMG. - DSachan (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per per "OMG" comment.--White Shadows ^{you're breaking up} 01:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 17:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Simpsons (season 2)[edit]

Co-nominators: From Season 2 Topic Drive: Theleftorium, Scorpion0422, Instinct, Cirt, Gary King, Ctjf83, ImperatorExercitus, and Peregrine Fisher.

After a year of hard work this topic has finally been completed. Season three is coming soon. :) The leftorium 22:02, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - needs a book! rst20xx (talk) 00:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done! The leftorium 09:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - fixed it up properly - rst20xx (talk) 13:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, great! ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:05, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great work. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support First, yes, Dead Putting Society. Awesome. Second, WOOO another Simpsons GT! Staxringold _talk^contribs 02:32, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support: I had the good fortune of reviewing a few articles in this topic; it's great to see such an excellent collaboration on such a wonderful subject that is The Simpsons. Another brilliant achievement, WP:DOH. The Flash ^{I am Jack's complete lack of surprise} 14:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Fantastic. Superb. Inspiring. Keep up the great work on the topic drive! — Hun ter Ka hn 00:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - one more topic to go!!!! rst20xx (talk) 03:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Montana: The Movie soundtrack[edit]

Hannah Montana: The Movie soundtrack

9 articles

"You'll Always Find Your Way Back Home"

"The Climb"

"Crazier"

"The Best of Both Worlds"

I believe that Hannah Montana: The Movie soundtrack meets all the criteria for being a Good Topic in Wikipedia. In fact, all eight articles about the topic are of Good Article status. I have personally worked on all these articles and think that there should be no problem in listing this as a Good Topic. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 06:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Throwing in my co-nom; I've worked on all of these articles and believe that they are up to standard. I also believe the topic includes all of the necessary articles, although we do plan on working on the movie and video game articles at some point. liquidluck✽talk 02:12, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 16:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I think this topic has an overly narrow focus, and a more general one on Hannah Montana: The Movie should be built instead. This topic would only need the articles Hannah Montana: The Movie and Hannah Montana: The Movie (video game) adding. The articles on the characters would not need adding as they are not exclusive to just this film - rst20xx (talk) 22:21, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you should include The Best of Both Worlds (song), though this is a GA so can simply be added. But the article should be expanded to mention the 2009 Movie Mix - rst20xx (talk) 22:42, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Added and information is mentioned in the lead, should suffice. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:18, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - If the articles on the movie and video game are promoted in the near future, then by all means the topic can be expanded to a greater focus. But for now, I don't see the focus as being overly narrow. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 22:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support current topic, with the hope that a larger topic can be created later. (Of course, I hope all topics can be expanded.) —Goodtimber (walk/talk) 23:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As per GeeJo. — Hun ter Ka hn 00:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 02:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]