Wikipedia:Article assessment/Extinct mammals/Aurochs
Assessment 
|
| Extinct mammals |
| Assessment completed 27 February 2006 – 5 March 2006 |
| Assessments |
| Aurochs Australopithecus |
Assessment of an article under the topic Extinct mammals.
Article: Aurochs
Details of the assessment method can be found at the main page. Feel free to add comments when you assess an article, or use the talk page for discussion.
Review by Martin Walker[edit]
- Coverage and factuality: 6
- Good basic coverage of topics, though I'd like to see some coverage of them as a food source for early hunter-gatherers, if this occurred. I'm not a biologist, so I can't validate facts. Another couple of refs would be nice. I think the article could be significantly longer, there must be more suitable content. One question I have - did any of the prehistoric worship/cults of aurochs lead to any modern cultural phenomena such as the "sacred cow" in Hinduism or bullfighting in Spain?
- Writing style: 10
- Excellent, I really enjoyed reading the piece
- Structure: 8
- Also very good.
- Aesthetics: 7
- I'd like to see a drawing of an aurochs, perhaps next to a modern cow or bull.
- Overall: 7
- An excellent short piece, I just wanted a longer article!
Review by violet/riga[edit]
- Coverage and factuality: 5
- Covers most things briefly, but is not thorough in any way when compared to the external links. The absence of inline citations also limits the possible score.
- Writing style: 8
- No major problems, but some parts could do with a little tweak.
- Structure: 5
- The lead is badly done, not summarising the article. The sections are not particularly intuitive.
- Aesthetics: 5
- Badly needs some image of an auroch other thana cave painting.
- Overall: 5
The article is not particularly well structured and does not cover things well enough. On the plus side, the prose is of a good standard. violet/riga (t) 21:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Review by [name][edit]
- Coverage and factuality:
- Writing style:
- Structure:
- Aesthetics:
- Overall: